Memorandum – Hunter Warfield – Account Information Request – 9015515

by on

MEMORANDUM

From: Michael J. Merritt, USN Retired/Writer
PO BOX 187
Newton, IA 50208
cipher.hunter@cipherphoenix.com

To: Hunter Warfield
4620 Woodland Corporate Blvd
Tampa, FL 33614

Info: Dickinson, Mackaman, Tyler & Hagen, P.C.
699 Walnut Street, Suite 1600
Des Moines, Iowa 50309-3986

Kading Properties
7008 Madison Ave
Urbandale, IA 50322

US Department of Housing and Urban Development
Kansas City Regional Office of FHEO Region 7
US Department of Housing and Urban Development
Gateway Tower II
400 State Avenue, Room 200
Kansas City, Kansas 66101-2406

Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20580
Telephone: (202) 326-2222

Federal Bureau of Investigation Omaha Field Office
4411 South 121st Court
Omaha, NE 68137-2112

Federal Bureau of Investigation Tampa Field Office
5525 West Gray Street
Tampa, FL 33609

Office of the Attorney General of Iowa
Consumer Protection Division
Hoover State Office Building
1305 E. Walnut Street
Des Moines, Iowa 50319-0106

Iowa Public Information Board
Wallace Building, Third Floor
502 East 9th Street
Des Moines, IA 50319

Jasper County Sheriff’s Office
2300 Law Center Drive
Newton, IA 50208

City of Newton, IA
101 W. 4th St. S.
Newton, IA 50208

City of Newton, IA Police Department
101 W. 4th St. S.
Newton, IA 50208

Office of Attorney General
State of Florida
The Capitol PL-01
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050

Subj: HUNTER WARFIELD – ACCOUNT INFORMATION REQUEST – 9015515

Ref: 1. 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1341 Frauds and swindles
2. 18 U.S.C. Section 1343 Fraud by wire, radio, or television
3. Iowa Code Title XIV Property | Chapter 562A – UNIFORM RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT LAW – Section 562A.12 – Rental deposits.
4. Iowa Code Title XIV Property | Chapter 562A – UNIFORM RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT LAW – Section 562A.15 – Landlord to maintain fit premises.
5. Iowa Code Title XIV Property | Chapter 562A – UNIFORM RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT LAW – Section 562A.21 – Noncompliance by the landlord – in general.
6. Iowa Code Title XVI Criminal Law Procedure | Chapter 714 – Theft, Fraud, and Related Offenses

Enc: 1. Kading Properties, LLC – Lease – 13 JUN 2021
2. Memorandum – Michael J. Merritt – 05 JUN 2022
3. Electronic Mail – David Wetsch – Dickinson Law – 24 JUN 2022
4. Electronic Mail – Michael J. Merritt – 31 JUL 2022
5. Electronic Mail – Michael J. Merritt – 20 AUG 2022
6. Memorandum – Michael J. Merritt – 14 SEP 2022
7. Electronic Mail – Hunter Warfield – 10 OCT 2022
8. Memorandum – Hunter Warfield – 9015515 – #01 – 10 OCT 2022
9. Memorandum – Hunter Warfield – 9005515 – #02 10 OCT 2022
8. Electronic Mail – Michael J. Merritt – 11 OCT 2022
9. Electronic Mail – Michael J. Merritt – 11 OCT 2022
12. Memorandum – David Wetsch – Dickinson Law – 13 OCT 2022
13. Electronic Mail – Michael J. Merritt – 24 OCT 2022
14. Electronic Mail – David Wetsch – 24 OCT 2022
15. Electronic Mail – Michael J. Merritt – 02 NOV 2022
16. Electronic Mail – David Wetsch – 02 NOV 2022
17. Electronic Mail – Michael J. Merritt – 02 NOV 2022
18. Memorandum – Iowa Open Records Request – City of Newton, IA – #019 – 30 NOV 2022
19. Memorandum – City Attorney Matthew Brick – City of Newton, IA – 14 DEC 2022
20. Electronic Mail – Brett Toresdahl – Iowa Public Information Board – 22 FEB 2023

1. Introduction

Multiple attempts have been made regarding receiving documentation from Hunter Warfield showing the origination and termination of the debt shown in Enclosures (7.), (8.), and (9.). Evidence indicates Kading Properties LLC submitted this debt to Hunter Warfield while not in adherence to Reference (3.).

It is the expectation of the originator of this correspondence to receive this documentation within 30 days of the date of this correspondence.

The originator of this correspondence is attempting to collect information regarding a debt that evidence indicates Kading Properties, LLC, submitted to Hunter Warfield. In contrast, evidence indicates Kading Properties, LLC failed to satisfy the requirements of Reference (3.). Therefore, the originator of this correspondence will use any information Hunter Warfield provides regarding investigating whether its client Kading Properties LLC filed this collection action in accordance with the Iowa Code and federal law.

2. Conclusion

The Iowa State Attorney General’s Office should ask how many Iowans the evidence indicates Kading Properties LLC has improperly withheld rental security deposits while failing to adhere to the requirements of Reference (3.). In addition, how many Iowans have Kading Properties, LLC, and its law firm failed to return rental deposits? At the same time, evidence indicates Kading Properties LLC assessed closeout fees not in accordance with Reference (3.)?

The question the Florida State Attorney General’s Office should be asking is how many interstate victims of withheld rental deposits and other collections actions does the evidence indicate Hunter Warfield manages that include collections actions that are not in accordance with the local laws of their business partners in neighboring states.

This situation was reported to Officer Watson of the City of Newton, IA Police Department on 18 NOV 2022. A record request was submitted to the City of Newton, IA Police Department on 30 NOV 2022 requesting the chest cam footage in accordance with Iowa Code Chapter 22 documenting this alleged criminal report Officer Watson disregarded. Enclosure (19.) shows the City of Newton, IA Attorney Matthew Brick of Brick Gentry P.C. articulating chest cam footage does not exist for the event while reporting this criminal event. This chest cam footage is now a part of Iowa Public Information Board case 23FC:0023.

Respectfully,


Michael J. Merritt, USN Retired/Writer
Founder:  cipherphoenix.com
Creative Writer/Musician
Information Warfare Specialist
Information Systems Manager
PO BOX 187
Newton, IA 50208
cipher.hunter@cipherphoenix.com

“Bricks made with testimony lacking evidence are equivalent to bricks made with straw without clay.”

Cipher Hunter

Legal Disclaimer: This correspondence was authored and published by only the party named as the originator of this correspondence. Logic suggests that threatening any other tenant named in Enclosure (1.) or another party with legal action other than the party identified as producing this correspondence is highly unethical and unreasonable. At the same time, attempting to have this correspondence or Enclosure (2.) removed from public view.